Image Gallery

ALL ALBUMS » Gallery » 24631
Figure 2 – (a) Creating a synthetic seismogram using the wavelet extracted from the upper half of the seismic section shows a good correlation with the real seismic data for the upper window. We do however notice higher frequency on the lower half of the synthetic seismogram. (b) Generating a synthetic seismogram using a wavelet extracted from seismic data after running thin-bed reflectivity inversion. The correlation coefficient calculated between the synthetic and the real seismic data traces, before and after thin-bed reflectivity inversion on seismic data between the windows indicated with the yellow bars is shown to increase from 0.723 to 0.818.
(2 of 6)
Figure 2 – (a) Creating a synthetic seismogram using the wavelet extracted from the upper half of the seismic section shows a good correlation with the real seismic data for the upper window. We do however notice higher frequency on the lower half of the synthetic seismogram. (b) Generating a synthetic seismogram using a wavelet extracted from seismic data after running thin-bed reflectivity inversion. The correlation coefficient calculated between the synthetic and the real seismic data traces, before and after thin-bed reflectivity inversion on seismic data between the windows indicated with the yellow bars is shown to increase from 0.723 to 0.818.